Official Journals By StatPerson Publication
Table of Content Volume 9 Issue 3 - June 2018
Role of ultrasound and colour doppler in assessment of adult scrotal pathologies
Ajay Vare1, Dayanand Kawade2*, Varsha Rote Kaginalkar3, Prashant Titare4, Samruddhi Sonawane5
1,4Associate Professor, 2,5Resident, 3Professor and HOD, Department of Radiology, Government Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, INDIA. Email: dayanandkawade@gmail.com
Abstract In this paper, we conclude, 1. Evaluation of scrotal pathologies by gray scale ultrasonography and colour doppler. 2. To classify the scrotal swelling. 3. To evaluate the clinically suspected cases of scrotal lesions by colour Doppler ultrasound. 4. To find out the sensitivity of colour Doppler ultrasound in detecting scrotal lesions. Key Words: Scrotal pathology.
INTRODUCTION The scrotum is a superficial structure separated by a midline septum, with each half of the scrotum containing testis, the epididymis and the lower part of the spermatic cord. The scrotal wall is composed of the following structures, listed from the superficial to the deep layers: skin, superficial fascia, dartos muscle, external spermatic fascia, cremasteric fascia, and internal spermatic fascia.1 In the clinical examination of the scrotal swelling, physical evaluation by itself may be inadequate due to tenderness, swelling or gross distortion of scrotal contents. It is often difficult to decide whether a palpable scrotal mass is arising from the testes itself or from the extra testicular elements. In addition, the normal examination may may skip significant pathology and physical signs elicited may be improperly interpreted. 1 Sonography played a vital role in the evaluation of testes obscured from palpation by large hydrocele and accurately separated intra testicular from extra testicular masses, even when the location is equivocal on physical examination.1 The most safety imaging modality for diagnoses scrotal abnormalities is ultrasound (u/s). Testicular u/s is a useful noninvasive tool in both adult and pediatric patient. It avails as a good screening and diagnostic method and helps transcribe further confirmation or exclude the clinical diagnosis.2,3 In the present study we combined USG with color Doppler interrogation which add important information for the guidance of treatment. From the view point that US is more convenient and easier to be performed in the emergency clinical settings than MRI, a contrast-enhanced ultrasound study would be the ideal tool in the assessment of testicular perfusion in patients with acute scrotal symptoms. The acute scrotum is a medical emergency defined as scrotal pain, swelling, and redness of acute onset. 4,5 Causes of scrotal pain include inflammation (epididymitis, epididymo-orchitis, abscess), testicular torsion, testicular trauma, and testicular cancer.6,7
MATERIALS AND METHODS Type of study: The study was hospital based prospective observational study conducted at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India. Source of Data: The patients referred to our department of Radiodiagnosis for scrotal ultrasonography and Doppler study by department of Surgery. Duration of study: The study was conducted for 2 years from May 2015 to May 2017. Sample size: A total of 106 patients referred to our department of Radiodiagnosis for scrotal ultrasonography and Doppler study recruited into the study. Method of collecting Data
Equipment: High-resolution real time gray scale ultrasonography and Doppler study of scrotum was carried out using 7.5 to 10 MHz linear transducer, abdominal ultrasonography in required cases was done using linear (5412/5-16MHz) transducer of ALOKA prosound alpha 7 ultrasound machine. Statistical Methods: The data obtained was coded and entered into Microsoft Excel Worksheet. Data collected in the study was analyzed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software.
OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
Table 1: Distribution of cases according to various age groups
Table-1: shows the age distributions of cases, which varied from 2 Years to 73 Years. Highest number of cases presented were in the age group of 31 to 40 years (58 cases – 29%), followed by 21 to 30 years (42 cases – 21%). The age groups of 21 to 40 years constitute 50%. Table 2: Clinical presentation
Most of the cases Clinically presented with combination of multiple symptoms. Combination: Commonest clinical presentation was combination of Symptoms like, pain and scrotal swelling, as in 34 cases (34%), Combination of pain, swelling and fever in 4 cases (4%) Table 3: Scrotal and testicular diseases: types of pathology detected
Table 4: showing side involvement:
Out of 92 cases, 26 cases had pathology bilaterally, unilaterally in 66 cases. Out of 66 cases of unilateral side involvement, 32 cases of involvement were on right side, 34 cases involvement was on left side. Totally, pathology was noted in 124 hemiscrotum out of 100 patients studied.
Table 5: Inflammatory scrotal pathology distribution
In our study, out of 100 cases, 24 cases were detected have inflammatory scrotal pathology on high frequency US and Doppler study. Acute Epididymoorchitis was the commonest inflammatory pathology detected, noted in 8 cases (33.3 %). Next most frequent inflammatory pathology detected was chronic epididymoorchitis, noted in 7cases (14.5%).
Table 6: Grey scale appearance of inlammatory scrotal pathologieS
Table 7: Color doppler appearance of inflammatory scrotal pathology
Figure 1(a and b): Gray scale and colour sonogram shows heterogeneous right testis with markedly increased vascularity on doppler study.findings consistent with right sided orchitis. Figure 2 (a and b): Gray scale and colour sonogram shows heterogeneous right testis with increased flow on doppler study.. findings consistent with orchitis
EPIDIDYMITIS: (a) and (b) Figure 3 (a and b): Gray scale andcolour sonogram shows epididyamis appears bulky and heterogeneous with imcreased flow on dopplerstudy. findings consistent with epididyamitis.
EPIDIDYMO-ORCHITIS: (a) and (b) Figure 4 (a and b): Gray scale andcolour sonogram shows testis and epididyamitis appears bulky and heterogeneous with increased flow on dopplerstudy..findings consistent with epididyamo-orchitis.
FUNICULITIS: (a) and (b) Figure 5: (a and b): Gray scale andcolour sonogram shows spermatic cord appears bulky and heterogeneous with surrounding fat stranding. findings consistent with funiculitis.
SCROTAL WALL LESION: Figure 6: Gray scale sonogram shows hypoechoic lesion in the scrotal wall showing no vascularity on Doppler study. findings consistent with scrotal wall lesion likely abscess
DISCUSSION Table 8: Inflammatory diseases of scrotum and its contents: comparison with other series
Table 9: Comparison with other series: (acute epididymitis)
Table 10: Comparison with other series: (acute epididymo-orchitis)
Table 11: Comparison with other series: (acute orchitis)
Epididymoorchitis: In our study, out of 100 cases, 28 cases were detected have inflammatory scrotal pathology on high frequency US and Doppler study. Types of inflammatory pathology detected with sidedness are depicted, acute epididymoorchitis was the commonest inflammatory pathology detected, noted in 8 cases (33.3%). Next most frequent inflammatory pathology detected was Chronicepididymoorchitis, noted in 3 cases (12.5%). Horstman, Middleton, and Nelson, in their study of 45 patients, found acute epididymitis present in 25 cases (56%), acute Epididymo-orchitis in 19 cases (42 %), acute orchitis in 1 case (2 %)8 No case of chronic Epididymoorchitis was reported. Lerner et al, 9 in their limited series of 5 cases of acute inflammatory diseases of scrotum, found acute epididymitis in 3 patients (60%), acute Epididymoorchitis in 2 patients (40%) Farriol et al,10 in their study of 25 cases of acute inflammatory diseases of scrotum using high-resolution grey scale and power Doppler sonographic study, found epididymitis in 11 cases (44%), Epididymo-orchitis in 10 cases (40%), orchitis in 2 cases (8%), funiculitis in 2 cases (8%). Comparison with other series is depicted in Table -10. In our study of 24 cases of inflammatory scrotal pathology, the High-resolution US appearance findings are depicted in Table 6 ; color Doppler findings are depicted in Table 7. The most common finding is hypoechogenicity of the testis and epididymis in acute epididymoorchitis (seen in 06 out of 24 cases) and heterogenous echo pattern in chronic epididymoorchitis (3 out of 24 cases). It is comparable to other studies. Of two cases of acute epididymitis, we observed diffuse hypoechogenicity with diffuse increase in vascularity, and diffuse increase in the size of epididymis. These findings are similar to the findings of Horstman et al, in their study of 45 cases (51 hemiscrotum), Farriolet al10, in their study of 11 cases. Comparison with other series: (acute epididymitis) is depicted in Table 9. Of eight cases of acute Epididymo-orchitis, 8 cases showed diffuse hypoechogenicity, 4cases showed focal hypoechogenicity, 8 cases were normal echotexture, 5 cases showed diffuse increase invascularity, 3 cases showed focal increases in vascularity, and size of epididymis was increased in 5 cases. These findings are similar to the findings of Horstman et al13, in their study of 45 cases (51 hemiscrotum), Farriol et al10, in their study of 11 cases 20These findings are similar to the findings of Horstman et al13, in their study of 45 cases (51 hemiscrotum), Farriol et al10, in their study of 11 cases shown in table 10. Of 3 cases of acute orchitis, one case showed focal involvement, one cases showed diffuse involvement. On high frequency US sonography, focal involvement appeared as focal area of hypoechogenicity, two cases of diffuse involvement, one cases showed diffuse enlargement with diffuse hypoechogenicity and one case showed diffuse involvement with normal size of the testis. On color Doppler sonography, all the cases showed increased vascularity in the areas of hypoechogenicity. These findings are similar to the findings of Horstman et al.13, in their study of 45 cases (51 hemiscrotum), Farriol et al10, in their study of 11 cases. Comparison with other series: (Acute orchitis) is depicted in Table-11. In our study of 24 cases of scrotal inflammatory pathologies, we observed 3 cases of complications of acute scrotal pathology, out of which 1 case was scrotal wall Cellulitis, 1 case of Fournier’s gangrene and 1 cases of funiculitis. In Cellulitis of scrotal wall, High-frequency US sonography showed loss of normal uniform hypoechoic appearance of scrotal wall, thickening of scrotal wall, presence of normal testis, epididymis and tunical sac. These findings are similar to those of Luker and Siegel.11 Of 24 cases of inflammatory scrotal pathology, we noted chronic Epididymo-orchitis in 5 cases. Of these, 2 cases were bilateral involvement, 3 cases were unilateral involvement. On High-frequency US sonography, we observed diffuse increase in size of epididymis with normal testicular size in 2 cases, normal size of epididymis and testis in 1 cases. There was heterogenousechotexture in 3 cases, hypoechogenicity in 1 cases, hyper echogenicity in 1 cases. There was evidence of epididymal calcification seen in 2 cases, testicular micro calcification in 2 cases. On color Doppler sonography, there was evidence of diffuse increase in vascularity in 4 cases, normal vascularity in 1 cases, focal increase in vascularity in 1 case. High-frequency US sonography and color Doppler sonography findings are in similarity with study KIM S H et al.12 In our study, acute epididymoorchitis is more in common which is comparable to other studies followed by chronic epididymoorchitis. The sensitivity and specificity of High-frequency ultrasonography compared to physical examination in evaluation of inflammatory pathology as a cause of acute/chronic pain and differentiating the cause of swelling is either intratesticular or extra testicular are calculated using the following formulae,
Which shows a low sensitivity of physical examination (15%), and low specificity (50%), where as high frequency ultrasonography is highly sensitive and specific(almost 100%), in identifying inflammatory pathology as the cause of acute/chronic pain and knowing the cause of swelling is either intratesticular or extra testicular compared to physical examination.
Table 12:
The Chi square statistic is 15.0361 and the P value is 0.000105. This result is significant at p<0.05.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
|
|